Was conquest or trade more effective in spreading Islam? Islam was never spread by conquest.
Historians have attempted to discover universal constants of human nature, a bond that forms from continent to continent, human being to human being.
Is there a constant quality that all peoples posses, and is reflected in all civilizations? Indeed, it is extremely difficult to make generalizations about centuries of modern history. To say that something is true of all of history is virtually impossible, as a counter-example exists for just about anything that can be said of any group of civilizations.
To say that all religions are spread by violence is equally unfair and untrue - because contrasted religions has been spread in exceedingly diverse regions of the world, by vastly different cultures. Islam, as a prime example, has been characterized inequitably by historians and the media as a religion of violence.
To put it bluntly, as this article does, "Islam was mainly spread through Arab territorial conquests Sudo, 4.
In fact, not only is Islam not a fundamentally violent philosophy, but we can also see that many other religions normally considered "non-violent," such as Christianity or Hinduism, have been spread through bloody conquest.
Thus, in searching for a universal constant of history, we ought not fall into the "fallacy of abstractions," as Sydney J. Harris keenly puts it, and assume that because of isolated incidents and conflicts of territorial ambitions, that all religions have violent tendencies. Islam has, throughout the centuries, been somewhat a victim of circumstance - indeed it has been perceived by many as oppressive and cruel.
This belief originated over a thousand years ago, when Islamic peoples first threatened the western world. As they slowly undermined Byzantine authority, Christians became terrified of their presence, resulting in widespread animosity and aversion.
Hindus and Buddhists of the South Asian subcontinent lived under Islamic law for hundreds of years Ahmad, et.
Mohammed, the prophet of Islam, was a great warrior. This invariably lead defeated peoples to believe that he begot a cult of war and violence. Over the centuries, it also has developed the ability to instill a sense of holy purpose onto its believers and soldiers, where they go into a battle of certain death for their faith in the jihad, or holy war.
Even today, the jihad is still a potent source of conflict and aversion, as the many of the problems in the Middle East center around the issue of Islamic Fundamentalism and the jihads.
Originally, Islam was perceived by western historians as a religion of violence and conquest; "by preying on the caravans of the Quraish, [Mohammed] weakened them to the point of submission Mohammed and Islam, 1.
He was forced to both defend his cities and force submission, as the passage had shown, because of the strong military powers of his religious predecessors and oppressors, the pagans of the Middle East.
Islam means "submission" according to the Islam discussion in class - and one might assume that the submission was attained through military and forceful means. In fact, while Mohammed preached peace from to AD, he attracted few converts and was persecuted by the current ruling paganistic regime.
After the visions of AD, he realized that his cause was even more urgent than before, and only at that point did he begin to utilize his military skills Class Discussion. However, despite the more violent nature that his quest took, even after the revelations by Gabriel in AD, "by reciting his revelations aloud, Mohammed made many converts, Mohammed and Islam,1.
He did not solely attack the pagans of the Middle East, he also attracted a great deal of converts by the truths he spoke. He could be Christ-like in his sympathy for the poor Mueller,2. People from all around the region would come to those cities to trade, and were attracted by the religion.
As Islam developed and spread rapidly, its control quickly began to encroach on Byzantine territory where it found diverse groups of people, who resented the foreign control of the flailing western power. The people viewed the Middle Eastern Islamic conquerors as liberators from the oppressive Byzantine Empire, and welcomed both Islamic soldiers and religion.
In addition to other non-violent means of conquest, when Muslims actually did militarily gain territory, they allowed other religions to grow around them. They did not force conversion by slaughter in the name of Allah, as Christians often did.
The Muslims were tolerant of both foreign religions, peoples, and traders.
They welcomed Far Eastern merchants into their territory. In Indiawhile they did militarily gain control of the South Asian subcontinent, they never forced conversion, nor did they enter the territory with a religious intent. Indeed, the reason that the Hindu and Muslim clashes arose was based on religious differences, which were largely initiated by the Hindus, who viewed their conquerors as heretics - not the opposite Ahmad, et.
In fact, that page of the text also notes that the first Delhi sultans set up hundreds of schools, hospitals, and other public establishments. The Koran was very tolerant, accepted many beliefs, and was another basis for the peaceful spread of Islam. The Koran, according to "The Koran" article and class discussions, appealed to the impoverished and the destitute - people from all walks of life could embrace the Koran, because it was targeted at them, not at the government-ranking aristocrats that most other religions were centered around, as those religions had been created for the purpose of social control, rather than deep spiritual convictions or for spiritual well-being.Through the Muslim conquest of Persia, in the 7th century, Islam spread as far as the North Caucasus, The spread of Islam in Africa began in the 7th to 9th rulers in Islamic Spain allowed Christians and Jews the right specified in the Koran to practice their own religions, though non-Muslims suffered from political and taxation.
Religions Spread Through Conquest- When studying history, both in a professional and academic sense, we try to make connections between civilizations and time periods. Historians have attempted to discover universal constants of human nature, a bond that forms from continent to continent, h.
Religions Spread Through Conquest- When studying history, both in a professional and academic sense, we try to make connections between civilizations and time Historians have attempted to discover universal constants of human nature, a bond that forms from .
Religions Spread Through Conquest When studying history, both in a professional and academic sense, we try to make connections between civilizations and time Historians have attempted to discover universal constants of human nature, a bond that forms from .
Religions Spread Through Conquest. When studying history, both in a professional and academic sense, we try to make connections between civilizations and time periods.
Historians have attempted to discover universal constants of human nature, a bond that forms from /5(1). - The spread of religion first began through contact with neighbouring countries which gradually expand throughout the years. Buddhism and Islam are one of the most widespread religions across Southeast Asian countries like Burma, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.