Natural water bodies will vary in response to environmental conditions. Environmental scientists work to understand how these systems function, which in turn helps to identify the sources and fates of contaminants. Environmental lawyers and policymakers work to define legislation with the intention that water is maintained at an appropriate quality for its identified use.
Licence This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed.
Cost-benefit analysis for invasive species control: Abstract Background Sound decisions on control actions for established invasive alien species IAS require information on ecological as well as socio-economic impact of the species and of its management.
Cost-benefit analysis provides part of this information, yet has received relatively little attention in the scientific literature on IAS. Methods We apply a bio-economic model in a cost-benefit analysis framework to greater Canada goose Branta canadensis, an IAS with documented social, economic and ecological impacts in Flanders northern Belgium.
We compared a business as usual BAU scenario which involved non-coordinated hunting and egg destruction with an enhanced scenario based on a continuation of these activities but supplemented with coordinated capture of moulting birds.
To assess population growth under the BAU scenario we fitted a logistic growth model to the observed pre-moult capture population. Projected damage costs included water eutrophication and damage to cultivated grasslands and were calculated for all scenarios.
Management costs of the moult captures were based on a representative average of the actual cost of planning and executing moult captures. Results Comparing the scenarios with different capture rates, different costs for eutrophication and various discount rates, showed avoided damage costs were in the range of Discussion The reduction in damage costs always outweighed the additional management costs of moult captures.
Therefore, additional coordinated moult captures could be applied to limit the negative economic impact of greater Canada goose at a regional scale.
We further discuss the strengths and weaknesses of our approach and its potential application to other IAS. Introduction Invasive alien species IAS can severely impact on society causing ecological, economic and human health impacts e.
Invasive species are sometimes intentionally introduced to exploit economic benefits associated with them, or have unintentionally crossed geographical barriers to establish elsewhere Perrings et al.
Moreover, IAS are also a leading cause of biodiversity loss Scalera et al. Under new European legislation, species identified as posing a high risk will be listed, and Member States will be required to take appropriate action if listed species are found on their territories.
This requires a number of processes to identify species, their associated risks and appropriate management options. Species posing high risks are identified based on risk assessments, for which a number of methods have been developed in recent years McGeoch et al.
These have to meet quality standards Roy et al.
First, when adopting or updating the list of IAS of Union concern see art. Second, derogations from the rapid eradication obligation of regulated species are possible based on either the unavailability of methods, on expected environmental non-target effects of the management measures taken or on a CBA demonstrating with reasonable certainty that the costs will, in the long term, be exceptionally high and disproportionate to the benefits of eradication European Union, Such measures shall be specific to the Member State, be proportionate to the environmental impact and be based on an analysis of the costs and benefits.
Cost-benefit analysis including ecological, social and economic aspects is a prominent requirement of the European IAS regulation.
However, it has only rarely been applied in a European context and there are currently no clear standards or guidelines for its application on IAS Tollington et al.
Given the need for more efficient allocation of scarce conservation resources Bottrill et al.
There are many examples of successful eradications on islands and the mainland Robertson et al. To assess eradication probabilities, data models based on case studies can be used to underpin decision making on managing IAS Drolet et al. Although these models offer interesting tools to guide decisions on IAS management, the lack of published data still prevents their widespread use.
If eradication is not feasible, long term control programs can be considered to mitigate IAS impact. The decision to engage in such programs has to consider various aspects to evaluate the feasibility.
More recently, invasion scientists and practitioners have focused on developing robust scoring protocols to assess the feasibility of management Booy et al. These protocols are mostly based on local expert knowledge and consider the species distribution and abundance, the probability of reinvasion, the effectiveness of management options, the cost of management, the non-target impacts of management, the prevailing legislation and a supposed understanding of public attitudes towards the envisaged eradication or management measures.
Based on this information, experts then assess the different management options. Such expert elicitation can provide an efficient, transparent tool for decision making Burgman et al. Although management costs are broadly evaluated, the cost of inaction or the cost-benefit ratio of the management strategy are not explicitly considered.
Hence, there is a need for decision support frameworks that integrate ecological and socio-economic impacts of IAS with information on the effectiveness and costs of potential management options. CBA offers a framework to combine data on management and damage costs.Fragment analysis of a representative human scalp swab specimen showed two distinct peaks associated with ITS I fragments and two peaks associated with ITS II fragments, indicating the presence of two Malassezia species (Fig.
(Fig.3). 3). Phytochemical Analysis And Determination Of Total Phenolics Content In Water Extracts Of Three Species Of Hedychium Kh.
Lemino Singh1 and G.C. Bag2* 1Institutional Biotech Hub, medicinal value of the plant. Water extracts of the three species of Hedychium tested negative for the presence = *****. central and even regional laboratories for water analysis, at the provincial and Results of physicochemical analysis are of no value if the samples tested are not properly collected and stored.
This has important consequences for sampling WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS,,, and, which,.,,,,,, a. Fecal Contamination Source Identification Methods in Surface Water ). The value of this ratio has been questioned because of variable survival rates of fecal streptococcus group species.
marine water. No High, analysis best with gene probe assays. More work needs to be done on lab methods. ASTM's water testing standards are instrumental in specifying and evaluating the methods and facilities used in examining the various characteristics of and contaminants in water for health, security, and environmental purposes.
Standard Guide for Understanding Cyanide Species: D - 16 Analysis of Water for Power Generation and. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis John B.
Loomis *, Douglas S. White federal agencies for benefit-cost analysis (US Water Resources Council, ) and Natural Resource value protection of T&E species.